🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.